<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2-ppt (info@mypapit.net)" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/feed.css" type="text/css"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/feed-atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>HS 20/20</title>
    <subtitle>HS 20/20</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/"/>
    <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/</id>
    <updated>2009-01-06T01:36:19+00:00</updated>
    <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2-ppt (info@mypapit.net)</generator>
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/syndicate/atom.xml" />
    <entry>
        <title>End of year post: Thinking before acting: the state of health policy and systems research in 2008</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2157/"/>
        <published>2008-12-14T20:15:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-14T20:15:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2157/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;i&gt;The 2004 ministerial forum on health research in Mexico emphasized a 'historical neglect' of health policy and systems research focusing on, and from low-income countries. In the four years since, what has changed and what should be the focus going forward? A review of a recent Lancet article by Bennett et al. reveals the answers.&lt;/i&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Dr Ali Gaji</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2149/"/>
        <published>1999-11-30T05:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>1999-11-30T05:00:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2149/</id>
        <author>
            <name>HS 20/20</name>
        </author>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>ch.s.naidu, apaidscon, hyderabad</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2121/"/>
        <published>1999-11-30T05:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>1999-11-30T05:00:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2121/</id>
        <author>
            <name>HS 20/20</name>
        </author>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Private Provider Retention in Ethiopia</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2117/"/>
        <published>2008-10-20T21:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-20T21:00:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2117/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>In Ethiopia, private providers are leaving clinics and hospitals in alarming numbers. A recent investigation tried to find out the reasons for the high turnover, and what could be done about it.</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Future Health Systems Part I: A Little Matter of Institutions</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2113/"/>
        <published>2008-10-08T10:15:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-08T10:15:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2113/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;i&gt;Is it too premature to be thinking of Future Health Systems, especially for low-income and transition countries? Given that the existing systems in sub-Saharan Africa and in low-income Asia are under stress from high disease burden (demand-side) and a lack of resources (supply-side), shouldn't we fix the problems currently at hand? Not premature at all, say the editors of a recent series of papers in the journal Social Science &amp; Medicine.&lt;/i&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Health systems - a strong foundation to support HIV/AIDS services</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2097/"/>
        <published>2008-09-16T12:30:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-16T12:30:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2097/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>There has been much discussion recently regarding the effect of HIV/AIDS programs on strengthening health systems as a whole. To take a step back, I would like to discuss how addressing health systems issues are critical to strengthening HIV/AIDS programs.</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Dr. Kazadi JC Mwayabo</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2093/"/>
        <published>1999-11-30T05:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>1999-11-30T05:00:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2093/</id>
        <author>
            <name>HS 20/20</name>
        </author>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>If it's not broken, then make it better</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2087/"/>
        <published>2008-08-26T17:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-26T17:00:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2087/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;i&gt;Now that we've all heard at IAC'08 and after: disease-specific programs do no harm to health systems and may in fact help them, what's on the agenda for integration and health system strengthening? An analysis of a recent piece by Daniel Low Beer from the Global Fund reveals some hints of what is on the horizon.&lt;/i&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>What’s love got to do with it</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2074/"/>
        <published>2008-08-06T16:45:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-06T16:45:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2074/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;p&gt;A study of 700 sero-positive adolescents in Uganda revealed them to be an ignored yet high risk group. As they entered adulthood, both young women and men expressed the desire to have a loving relationship and raise a family.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Another critique of the Abuja target</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2073/"/>
        <published>2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2073/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;p&gt;The Abuja target calls for African countries to spend 15% of their public budget on health, typically measured as funds allocated to the ministry of health.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Is the HIV/AIDS Response Strengthening Health Systems?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2072/"/>
        <published>2008-08-12T19:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-12T19:00:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2072/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>There were no less than four sessions* looking at the question of how the AIDS response is affecting country health systems – here are some highlights.</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Is robbing Peter to pay Paul worth worrying about?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2047/"/>
        <published>2008-08-13T16:00:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-13T16:00:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2047/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>Few health systems topics received more attention at the IAC than the question of whether we should blame the advent of the AIDS virus as the cause of funding and resources being channeled away from the general health system (into vertical programs) or applaud the arrival of AIDS as the catalyst for the activism needed to identify the inadequacies of health care systems. Of course, as you would expect from persons attending an AIDS conference, just about everyone agreed that AIDS advocacy and funding efforts were strengthening health systems in general.

I tend to agree with those who were not concerned about how we arrived here, or the merits of one catalyst for change over another, but who were anxious to move forward.  Various health systems and funding systems exist.  There will always be vertical and horizontal funding streams.  There will always be competing priorities.  We should stop wasting time and resources discussing which one works better or which priority is more important. We need to move forward the best we can. As Sigrun Mogedal, Ambassador for AIDS and Global Health Initiatives Norway and Chair of GHWA said: We are in the midst of competing priorities and voices… We have to work across all sectors… We cannot wait until all these things are fixed.  We have to live with the complexity and be involved under several streams of activity at the same time.</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Health systems versus AIDS programs: A new discussion on a familiar topic</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2043/"/>
        <published>2008-08-08T14:30:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-08T14:30:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2043/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;p&gt;Thirty years ago a similar discussion happened in relation to Family Planning programs. At that time there was an important concern about the apparently opposite approaches to the so called “vertical health programs” versus “comprehensive health programs,” the latter related today to the modern expression “health systems.” Probably everybody remembers the end of this story: vertical programs were a good idea in the short term but in the long term they necessarily had to be integrated into the national health systems for many reasons. Probably the most important reason was to guarantee they were sustainable. The other lesson learned was that vertical and comprehensive health programs were not really opposite approaches. The programs were inseparable parts of the system.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>“Diagonality” in Practice: Julio Frenk on “Diagonal” Health System Reform in Mexico</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2041/"/>
        <published>2008-08-06T14:45:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-06T14:45:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2041/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;p&gt;In his introduction to Bill Clinton’s keynote address on day 2 of the International AIDS Conference, Mexico’s former Minister of Health, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gatesfoundation.org/AboutUs/QuickFacts/LeadershipStaff/BioGHFrenk.htm&quot;&gt;Julio Frenk&lt;/a&gt;, made an impassioned plea for the virtues of &lt;a href=&quot;/content/blog/detail/2027/&quot;&gt;“diagonality.”&lt;/a&gt; Frenk argued that the intense attention and relatively lavish funding being directed at tackling the global pandemic offer an opportunity to settle the long-standing debate between horizontal and vertical (or disease-specific) approaches.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Health systems is the conference late-breaking theme</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2040/"/>
        <published>2008-08-05T16:15:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-05T16:15:00+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://www.healthsystems2020.org/content/blog/detail/2040/</id>
        <author>
            <name></name>
        </author>
        <summary>&lt;p&gt;Although a search for &quot;health systems&quot;-related sessions at the Mexico conference yielded only a few sessions, this has clearly become one of the predominant themes of discussion here.  Last night's session on &quot;Positive Synergies between Health Systems and Global Health Initiatives&quot; brought together all the &quot;stars&quot; in the observatory, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/hcast_index.cfm?display=detail&amp;hc=2872&quot;&gt;Julio Frenck noted&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    </entry>
</feed>
